The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Gonazlo Delgado Razo has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Razo has not filed a response, has completed the confinement portion of his sentence, and has been removed from the United States. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review even if the challenge to his sentence is not moot. See United States v. Rosenbaum-Alanis, 483 F.3d 381, 381-83 (5th Cir. 2007); see also United States v. Heredia-Holguin, 789 F.3d 625 (5th Cir.), reh’g en bane granted, 803 F.3d 745 (5th Cir. 2015). Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.