Appealing the judgment in a criminal case, Florencio Nolasco-Peraza raises arguments that he concedes are foreclosed by United States v. Rodriguez, 711 F.3d 541, 559-62 & n. 28 (5th Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 184 S.Ct. 512, 187 L.Ed.2d 865 (2013), in which this court held that the generic-contemporary definition of “sexual abuse of a minor” does not require that the age of consent be below 17 years old and does not include the age-differential requirement that Nolaseo-Per-aza asserts is required. The motion for summary disposition is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.