The attorney appointed to represent Jesus Espinoza-Martinez has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Espinoza-Martinez has filed a response. We have re*317viewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein, , as well as Espinoza-Martinez’s response. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. . Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.