U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, 2016

United States v. Ronald Norman

United States v. Ronald Norman
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Decided February 3, 2016

United States v. Ronald Norman

Opinion

Case: 14-20679 Document: 00513368150 Page: 1 Date Filed: 02/03/2016

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-20679 Summary Calendar United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED February 3, 2016 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Plaintiff-Appellee v. RONALD NORMAN, Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 4:02-CR-668

Before KING, CLEMENT, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: * The attorney appointed to represent Ronald Norman has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011).

Norman has filed a response as well as a motion for leave to file a supplemental response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein, as well as Norman’s responses. We concur with

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

Case: 14-20679 Document: 00513368150 Page: 2 Date Filed: 02/03/2016

No. 14-20679 counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw and Norman’s motion for leave to file a supplemental response are GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.