U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, 2016

United States v. Christopher Joseph

United States v. Christopher Joseph
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Decided February 1, 2016

United States v. Christopher Joseph

Opinion

Case: 14-31232 Document: 00513363245 Page: 1 Date Filed: 02/01/2016

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit No. 14-31232 FILED Summary Calendar February 1, 2016 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee v. CHRISTOPHER JOSEPH, Defendant-Appellant

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana USDC No. 2:13-CR-184

Before REAVLEY, SMITH, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: * The attorney appointed to represent Christopher Joseph has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed briefs in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011).

Joseph has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s briefs and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review.

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

Case: 14-31232 Document: 00513363245 Page: 2 Date Filed: 02/01/2016

No. 14-31232 Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED.

See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.