United States v. Raul Ramos
United States v. Raul Ramos
634 F. App'x 979
United States v. Raul Ramos
Opinion
Appealing the judgment in a criminal case, Raul Baldomero Ramos raises an argument that is foreclosed by United States v. Betancourt, 586 F.3d 303, 308-09 (5th Cir. 2009), which held that knowledge of drug type and quantity is not an element of a 21 U.S.C. § 841 offense. The motion for summary disposition is *980 GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
*
Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47,5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.