U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, 2016

United States v. Octavio Ortega-Regalado

United States v. Octavio Ortega-Regalado
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Decided February 18, 2016

United States v. Octavio Ortega-Regalado

Opinion

Case: 15-40664 Document: 00513384949 Page: 1 Date Filed: 02/17/2016

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-40664 Conference Calendar United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED February 17, 2016 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Plaintiff-Appellee v. OCTAVIO ORTEGA-REGALADO, Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 5:14-CR-864-1

Before DAVIS, SMITH, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: * The attorney appointed to represent Octavio Ortega-Regalado has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Ortega-Regalado has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

Case: 15-40664 Document: 00513384949 Page: 2 Date Filed: 02/17/2016

No. 15-40664 issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.