U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, 2016

United States v. Marco Estrada-Gonzalez

United States v. Marco Estrada-Gonzalez
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Decided February 18, 2016

United States v. Marco Estrada-Gonzalez

Opinion

Case: 15-40662 Document: 00513384571 Page: 1 Date Filed: 02/17/2016

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-40662 Conference Calendar United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED February 17, 2016 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Plaintiff-Appellee v. MARCO ESTRADA-GONZALEZ, Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas USDC No. 4:13-CR-281-43

Before DAVIS, SMITH, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: * The attorney appointed to represent Marco Estrada-Gonzalez has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Estrada-Gonzalez has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

Case: 15-40662 Document: 00513384571 Page: 2 Date Filed: 02/17/2016

No. 15-40662 issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.