U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, 2016

United States v. Rodrigo Gonzalez-Alvarez

United States v. Rodrigo Gonzalez-Alvarez
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Decided March 7, 2016 · Higginbotham, Elrod, Southwick
633 F. App'x 291

United States v. Rodrigo Gonzalez-Alvarez

Opinion

PER CURIAM: *

The attorney appointed to represent Rodrigo Gonzalez-Alvarez has moved for *292 leave to withdraw and has filed briefs in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Gonzalez-Alvarez has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s briefs and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cm. R. 42.2.

*

Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be *292 published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir, R. 47.5.4.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.