U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, 2016

United States v. Marcus Goynes

United States v. Marcus Goynes
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Decided March 24, 2016

United States v. Marcus Goynes

Opinion

Case: 15-40684 Document: 00513438365 Page: 1 Date Filed: 03/24/2016

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit No. 15-40684 FILED Summary Calendar March 24, 2016 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee v. MARCUS OKEITH GOYNES, Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas USDC No. 4:13-CR-37-11

Before DAVIS, JONES, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: * The attorney appointed to represent Marcus Okeith Goynes has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Goynes has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

Case: 15-40684 Document: 00513438365 Page: 2 Date Filed: 03/24/2016

No. 15-40684 appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.