U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, 2016

United States v. Lucas Kinney

United States v. Lucas Kinney
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Decided April 20, 2016

United States v. Lucas Kinney

Opinion

Case: 15-40932 Document: 00513472637 Page: 1 Date Filed: 04/20/2016

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED No. 15-40932 April 20, 2016 Conference Calendar Lyle W. Cayce Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee v. LUCAS KINNEY, Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas USDC No. 4:13-CR-102-10

Before REAVLEY, ELROD, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: * The attorney appointed to represent Lucas Kinney has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011).

Kinney has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review.

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

Case: 15-40932 Document: 00513472637 Page: 2 Date Filed: 04/20/2016

No. 15-40932 Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED.

See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.