U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, 2016

United States v. Carlos Perez-Ortiz

United States v. Carlos Perez-Ortiz
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Decided June 3, 2016 · Reavley, Smith, Haynes
653 F. App'x 805

United States v. Carlos Perez-Ortiz

Opinion

PER CURIAM: *

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Carlos Perez-Ortiz has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Perez-Ortiz has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal *806 presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the. APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cíe. R. 42.2.

*

Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.