Juan Antonio Melgar-Melgar petitions for review of the decision by the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) to dismiss his appeal of the Immigration Judge’s (IJ) •order denying his motion to reopen. Melgar-Melgar’s conclusional assertion that •he did not receive notice of the removal hearing fails to show any abuse of discre-tion in the denial of his motion to reopen. See Zhao v. Gonzales, 404 F.3d 295, 303- *188 04 (5th Cir. 2005). We lack jurisdiction to review Melgar-Melgar’s due process claims because he failed to exhaust them before the BIA. See Claudio v. Holder, 601 F.3d 316, 318-19 (5th Cir. 2010); Omari v. Holder, 562 F.3d 314, 319-21 (5th Cir. 2009).

Melgar-Melgar’s petition for review is DENIED in part and DISMISSED in part for lack of jurisdiction.