U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, 2016

United States v. Jose Selio, Jr.

United States v. Jose Selio, Jr.
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Decided August 23, 2016

United States v. Jose Selio, Jr.

Opinion

Case: 14-20134 Document: 00513648469 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/23/2016

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals No. 14-20134 Fifth Circuit FILED Summary Calendar August 23, 2016 Lyle W. Cayce UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Clerk

Plaintiff-Appellee v. JOSE VASQUEZ SELIO, JR., Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 4:13-CR-376-1

Before PRADO, HAYNES, and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: * The attorney appointed to represent Jose Vasquez Selio, Jr., has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Selio has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

Case: 14-20134 Document: 00513648469 Page: 2 Date Filed: 08/23/2016

No. 14-20134 appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.