U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, 2016

United States v. Juan Pardo-Pardo

United States v. Juan Pardo-Pardo
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Decided September 20, 2016

United States v. Juan Pardo-Pardo

Opinion

Case: 15-41609 Document: 00513684972 Page: 1 Date Filed: 09/20/2016

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals No. 15-41609 Fifth Circuit FILED Summary Calendar September 20, 2016 Lyle W. Cayce UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Clerk

Plaintiff-Appellee v. JUAN MANUEL PARDO-PARDO, Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas USDC No. 4:14-CR-81-3

Before DAVIS, SOUTHWICK, and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges.

STEPHEN A. HIGGINSON, Circuit Judge: * The attorney appointed to represent Juan Manuel Pardo-Pardo has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Pardo-Pardo has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

Case: 15-41609 Document: 00513684972 Page: 2 Date Filed: 09/20/2016

No. 15-41609 appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.