U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, 2016

United States v. Jose Lopez-Mendoza

United States v. Jose Lopez-Mendoza
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Decided September 20, 2016

United States v. Jose Lopez-Mendoza

Opinion

Case: 16-10049 Document: 00513685323 Page: 1 Date Filed: 09/20/2016

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals No. 16-10049 Fifth Circuit FILED Summary Calendar September 20, 2016 Lyle W. Cayce UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Clerk

Plaintiff-Appellee v. JOSE LOPEZ-MENDOZA, Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 4:15-CR-171-1

Before JOLLY, SMITH, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: * The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Jose Lopez- Mendoza has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Lopez-Mendoza has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

Case: 16-10049 Document: 00513685323 Page: 2 Date Filed: 09/20/2016

No. 16-10049 nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.