The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Yvonne Ramirez has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Ramirez has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel *209 is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cíe. R. 42.2.

The judgment, though, contains a clerical error pertaining to Ramirez’s "written judgment. The judgment identifies the statute violated as “21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1) and 841[ (a)(1)(B) ],” but the bracketed material should instead refer to “(b)(1)(B).” We therefore REMAND to the district court for correction of this clerical error. See Fed. R. Crim. P. 36.