Jeremy Mundine, Texas prisoner # 1131861, moves for leave to appeal in forma pauperis (IFP) the dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 suit pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). Mundine does not dispute that he has three strikes but argues that he should not be subject to the § 1915(g) bar becausé he is in imminent danger of serious physical injury. In support of his contention, he asserts that he was required to perform .manual *248 labor in violation of medical restrictions, and, as a result, he suffered severe pain, and his pre-existing back injury worsened. Mundine acknowledges that he received medical treatment, additional medical restrictions, and a new work assignment following his most recent injuries, but he insists that he remains in imminent danger.

Mundine’s allegations do not establish that he is in imminent danger of serious physical injury. See Baños v. O’Guin, 144 F.3d 883, 884-85 (5th Cir. 1998). Accordingly, his motion for leave to proceed IFP is DENIED, and his appeal is DISMISSED.