U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, 2016

United States v. Raul Peraza-Trejo

United States v. Raul Peraza-Trejo
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Decided October 7, 2016

United States v. Raul Peraza-Trejo

Opinion

Case: 14-41131 Document: 00513709335 Page: 1 Date Filed: 10/07/2016

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals No. 14-41131 Fifth Circuit FILED Summary Calendar October 7, 2016 Lyle W. Cayce UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Clerk

Plaintiff-Appellee v. RAUL PERAZA-TREJO, Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 2:12-CR-757-1

Before KING, DENNIS, and COSTA, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: * The attorney appointed to represent Raul Peraza-Trejo has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief and a supplemental brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Peraza-Trejo has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s briefs and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

Case: 14-41131 Document: 00513709335 Page: 2 Date Filed: 10/07/2016

No. 14-41131 nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.