U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, 2016

United States v. Leonel Martinez-Mancilla

United States v. Leonel Martinez-Mancilla
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Decided October 18, 2016

United States v. Leonel Martinez-Mancilla

Opinion

Case: 16-40216 Document: 00513722337 Page: 1 Date Filed: 10/18/2016

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-40216 Conference Calendar United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED October 18, 2016 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Plaintiff-Appellee v. LEONEL MARTINEZ-MANCILLA, Defendant-Appellant

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 1:12-CR-593-1

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, JONES, and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: * The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Leonel Martinez- Mancilla has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Martinez-Mancilla has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

Case: 16-40216 Document: 00513722337 Page: 2 Date Filed: 10/18/2016

No. 16-40216 nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.