Hipólito Segura-Sanchez appeals the 12-month sentence imposed following the revocation of his supervised release on the grounds that it is procedurally and substantively unreasonable. Review is for plain error because Segura-Sanchez did not object. See United States v. Whitelaw, 580 F.3d 256, 259-60 (5th Cir. 2009).

Segura-Sanchez fails to demonstrate any error, plain or otherwise. A district court does not procedurally err by weighing some 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) factors more *240 heavily than others. See United States v. Hernandez, 633 F.3d 370, 375-76 (5th Cir. 2011). His argument fails to rebut the presumption of reasonableness that applies to his consecutive, within-guidelines sentence. See United States v. Lopez-Velasquez, 526 F.3d 804, 809 (5th Cir. 2008); United States v. Candia, 454 F.3d 468, 473 (5th Cir. 2006); U.S.S.G. § 7B1.3(f) & cmt. n.4.

The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.