U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, 2016

United States v. Rodolfo Lucero-Rodriguez

United States v. Rodolfo Lucero-Rodriguez
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Decided October 31, 2016

United States v. Rodolfo Lucero-Rodriguez

Opinion

Case: 16-40050 Document: 00513739950 Page: 1 Date Filed: 10/31/2016

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-40050 Summary Calendar United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED October 31, 2016 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Plaintiff-Appellee v. RODOLFO LUCERO-RODRIGUEZ, Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 7:15-CR-1197-1

Before DAVIS, SOUTHWICK, and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: * The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Rodolfo Lucero- Rodriguez has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Lucero-Rodriguez has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

Case: 16-40050 Document: 00513739950 Page: 2 Date Filed: 10/31/2016

No. 16-40050 nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.