U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, 2016

United States v. Daniel Montiel-Ramirez

United States v. Daniel Montiel-Ramirez
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Decided November 7, 2016

United States v. Daniel Montiel-Ramirez

Opinion

Case: 16-40365 Document: 00513749136 Page: 1 Date Filed: 11/07/2016

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals No. 16-40365 Fifth Circuit FILED Summary Calendar November 7, 2016 Lyle W. Cayce UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Clerk

Plaintiff-Appellee v. DANIEL MONTIEL-RAMIREZ, Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 5:15-CR-975-1

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, PRADO, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: * The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Daniel Montiel- Ramirez has filed a motion to withdraw and a brief that relies on Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Montiel-Ramirez has filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant parts of the record reflected therein, as well as Montiel- Ramirez’s response. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s * Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

Case: 16-40365 Document: 00513749136 Page: 2 Date Filed: 11/07/2016

No. 16-40365 motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.