U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, 2016

United States v. Mario Ordonez-Coreas

United States v. Mario Ordonez-Coreas
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Decided November 10, 2016

United States v. Mario Ordonez-Coreas

Opinion

Case: 16-10473 Document: 00513755571 Page: 1 Date Filed: 11/10/2016

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED No. 16-10473 November 10, 2016 Summary Calendar Lyle W. Cayce Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee v. MARIO ALFREDO ORDONEZ-COREAS, Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 3:15-CR-265-1

Before JOLLY, SMITH, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: * The attorney appointed to represent Mario Alfredo Ordonez-Coreas has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Ordonez-Coreas has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

Case: 16-10473 Document: 00513755571 Page: 2 Date Filed: 11/10/2016

No. 16-10473 issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.