U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, 2016

United States v. Fernando Barraza-Reveles

United States v. Fernando Barraza-Reveles
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Decided November 14, 2016

United States v. Fernando Barraza-Reveles

Opinion

Case: 16-50242 Document: 00513758729 Page: 1 Date Filed: 11/14/2016

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals No. 16-50242 Fifth Circuit FILED Summary Calendar November 14, 2016 Lyle W. Cayce UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Clerk

Plaintiff-Appellee v. FERNANDO BARRAZA-REVELES, Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 2:13-CR-1106-1

Before JONES, WIENER, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: * The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Fernando Barraza- Reveles has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Barraza-Reveles has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

Case: 16-50242 Document: 00513758729 Page: 2 Date Filed: 11/14/2016

No. 16-50242 nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.