Jose Fidencio Garza, Texas prisoner # 01576511, appeals the dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1915(e)(2)(B)® and (ii) and 1915A(b)(l) as frivolous and for failure to' state a claim on which relief may be granted. The district court did not err in dismissing the complaint as his claims lacked an arguable basis in law or contained insufficient factual matter to state a plausible claim for relief. See Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 678, 129 S.Ct. 1937, 173 L.Ed.2d 868 (2009); Samford v. Dretke, 562 F.3d 674, 678 (5th Cir. 2009); Black v. Warren, 134 F.3d 732, 734 (5th Cir. 1998). The judgment is AFFIRMED. The motions for discovery of evidence, disqualification and summary judgment, and expedited consideration are DENIED.

The dismissal of Garza’s § 1983 complaint as frivolous and for failure to state a claim on which relief may be granted counts as a strike under § 1915(g). See § 1915(g); Coleman v. Tollefson, — U.S. -, 135 S.Ct. 1759, 1763-64, 191 L.Ed.2d 803 (2015); Adepegba v. Hammons, 103 F.3d 383, 387-88 (5th Cir. 1996). Garza is WARNED that if he accumulates three strikes, he will not be allowed to proceed in forma pauperis in any civil action or appeal filed while he is incarcerated or detained in any facility unless he is under imminent danger of serious physical injury. See § 1915(g).