Juan Canas Cervantes-Sandoval appeals the sentence he received following his guilty plea conviction for illegal reentry. The sole issue is whether the district court committed reversible error in imposing a sixteen-level increase under U.S. Sentencing Guideline § 2L1.2(b)(l)(A)(ii) based on its determination that Cervantes-Sandoval was previously deported following a conviction for a crime of violence (“COV”).

Cervantes-Sandoval contends that his prior conviction for aggravated assault under Ga. Code § 16-5-21(a) is not a COV because the least culpable act under the statute: (1) does not meet the generic, contemporary definition of “aggravated assault” in U.S.S.G. § 2L1.2; and (2) does not have as an element the use, attempted use, or threatened use of physical force against another.

The arguments that Cervantes-Sandoval has raised are identical to those rejected by this Court in United States v. Torres-Jaime, 821 F.3d 577, 581-85 (5th Cir. 2016). As Cervantes-Sandoval concedes, Torres-Jaime is binding precedent that *316 forecloses his arguments, even in the wake of Mathis v. United States, — U.S.—, 136 S.Ct. 2243, 195 L.Ed.2d 604 (2016). See United States v. Hernandez-Cifuentes, No. 16-40550, 670 Fed.Appx. 233, .234, 2016 WL 6210703, at *1 (5th Cir. Oct. 24, 2016). Accordingly, for the reasons explained in Torres-Jaime, the district court did not err in determining that Cervantes-Sandoval’s prior conviction for aggravated assault was a COV and applying the sixteen-level § 2L1.2(b) enhancement. The judgment of the district court is therefore AFFIRMED.