U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, 2016

United States v. Rosendo Padilla, Jr.

United States v. Rosendo Padilla, Jr.
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Decided December 16, 2016

United States v. Rosendo Padilla, Jr.

Opinion

Case: 16-40235 Document: 00513800261 Page: 1 Date Filed: 12/16/2016

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit No. 16-40235 FILED Summary Calendar December 16, 2016 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee v. ROSENDO PADILLA, JR., Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 1:08-CR-183-1

Before DAVIS, SOUTHWICK, and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: * The attorney appointed to represent Rosendo Padilla, Jr., has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011).

Padilla has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review.

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

Case: 16-40235 Document: 00513800261 Page: 2 Date Filed: 12/16/2016

No. 16-40235 Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED.

See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.