The attorney appointed to represent Jaime Luis Estrada-Monzon in the appeal of his revocation sentence has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Estrada-Monzon has filed a response and has moved for *447 appointment of new counsel. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein, as well as Estrada-Monzon’s response. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, Estrada-Monzon’s motion for appointment of counsel is DENIED, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.