U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, 2016

United States v. Norman

United States v. Norman
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Decided February 3, 2016 · Clement, King, Owen
631 F. App'x 266

United States v. Norman

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM: *

The attorney appointed to represent Ronald Norman has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Norman has filed a response as well as a motion for leave to file a supplemental response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein, as well as Norman’s responses. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion *267for leave to withdraw and Norman’s motion for leave to file a supplemental response are GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.

Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47,5.4.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.