U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, 2016

United States v. Kerscher

United States v. Kerscher
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Decided April 21, 2016 · Elrod, Higginbotham, Southwick
639 F. App'x 247

United States v. Kerscher

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM: *

The attorney appointed to represent Joel Kerscher has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Kerscher has filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein, as well as Kerscher’s response. We concur with counsel’s assessmént that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.

Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir, R. 47.5.4.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.