U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, 2016

United States v. Pardo-Pardo

United States v. Pardo-Pardo
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Decided September 20, 2016 · Davis, Higginson, Southwick
668 F. App'x 635

United States v. Pardo-Pardo

Opinion of the Court

STEPHEN A. HIGGINSON, Circuit Judge: *

The attorney appointed to represent Juan Manuel Pardo-Pardo has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (6th Cir. 2011). Pardo-Pardo has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.

Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.