U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, 2017

United States v. Daniel Arguelles

United States v. Daniel Arguelles
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Decided February 2, 2017

United States v. Daniel Arguelles

Opinion

Case: 16-50512 Document: 00513860327 Page: 1 Date Filed: 02/02/2017

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals No. 16-50512 Fifth Circuit FILED Summary Calendar February 2, 2017 Lyle W. Cayce UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Clerk

Plaintiff-Appellee v. DANIEL ARGUELLES, Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 7:15-CR-239-1

Before REAVLEY, OWEN, and ELROD, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: * The attorney appointed to represent Daniel Arguelles has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011).

Arguelles has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review.

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

Case: 16-50512 Document: 00513860327 Page: 2 Date Filed: 02/02/2017

No. 16-50512 Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED.

See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.