U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, 2017

United States v. Lazaro Santos-Rodriguez

United States v. Lazaro Santos-Rodriguez
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Decided February 2, 2017

United States v. Lazaro Santos-Rodriguez

Opinion

Case: 16-40858 Document: 00513860533 Page: 1 Date Filed: 02/02/2017

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals No. 16-40858 Fifth Circuit FILED Summary Calendar February 2, 2017 Lyle W. Cayce UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Clerk

Plaintiff-Appellee v. LAZARO SANTOS-RODRIGUEZ, Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 1:16-CR-19-1

Before REAVLEY, OWEN, and ELROD, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: * The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Lazaro Santos- Rodriguez has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Santos-Rodriguez has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

Case: 16-40858 Document: 00513860533 Page: 2 Date Filed: 02/02/2017

No. 16-40858 nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.