U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, 2017

United States v. Randall Borden

United States v. Randall Borden
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Decided February 21, 2017

United States v. Randall Borden

Opinion

Case: 16-20341 Document: 00513884114 Page: 1 Date Filed: 02/21/2017

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-20341 Conference Calendar United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED February 21, 2017 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Plaintiff-Appellee v. RANDALL COREY BORDEN, Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 4:11-CR-253-1

Before JOLLY, PRADO, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: * The attorney appointed to represent Randall Corey Borden has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Borden has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

Case: 16-20341 Document: 00513884114 Page: 2 Date Filed: 02/21/2017

No. 16-20341 appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.