U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, 2017

United States v. Marcos Chairez

United States v. Marcos Chairez
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Decided February 21, 2017

United States v. Marcos Chairez

Opinion

Case: 16-11032 Document: 00513882759 Page: 1 Date Filed: 02/21/2017

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-11032 Conference Calendar United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED February 21, 2017 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Plaintiff-Appellee v. MARCOS DANIEL CHAIREZ, Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 5:15-CR-96-1

Before JOLLY, PRADO, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: * The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Marcos Daniel Chairez has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Chairez has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

Case: 16-11032 Document: 00513882759 Page: 2 Date Filed: 02/21/2017

No. 16-11032 issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.