U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, 2017

United States v. Rigoberto Zuniga-Espinoza

United States v. Rigoberto Zuniga-Espinoza
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Decided March 20, 2017

United States v. Rigoberto Zuniga-Espinoza

Opinion

Case: 16-50082 Document: 00513917670 Page: 1 Date Filed: 03/20/2017

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit No. 16-50082 FILED Summary Calendar March 20, 2017 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee v. RIGOBERTO ZUNIGA-ESPINOZA, Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 4:15-CR-457-6

Before DAVIS, SOUTHWICK, and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: * The attorney appointed to represent Rigoberto Zuniga-Espinoza has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Zuniga-Espinoza has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

Case: 16-50082 Document: 00513917670 Page: 2 Date Filed: 03/20/2017

No. 16-50082 issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.