U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, 2017

United States v. Victor Marroquin

United States v. Victor Marroquin
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Decided March 27, 2017

United States v. Victor Marroquin

Opinion

Case: 16-10639 Document: 00513927358 Page: 1 Date Filed: 03/27/2017

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals No. 16-10639 Fifth Circuit FILED Summary Calendar March 27, 2017 Lyle W. Cayce UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Clerk

Plaintiff-Appellee v. VICTOR HUGO MARROQUIN, Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 3:15-CR-427-8

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, PRADO, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: * The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Victor Hugo Marroquin has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Marroquin has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

Case: 16-10639 Document: 00513927358 Page: 2 Date Filed: 03/27/2017

No. 16-10639 nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.