Rosbel Flores-Vera appeals the 84-month sentence imposed by the district court after his guilty plea conviction for being found in the United States illegally following a prior conviction for an aggravated felony. Relying upon Mathis v. United States, — U.S. -, 136 S.Ct. 2243, 195 L.Ed.2d 604 (2016), he argues that the district court erred by imposing a U.S.S.G. § 2L1.2(b)(l)(A)(ii) enhancement based upon his prior conviction under Texas Penal Code § 30.02(a)(1).

We review the district court’s application of the Sentencing Guidelines de novo. See United States v. Cisneros-Gutierrez, 517 F.3d 751, 764 (5th Cir. 2008). We have previously held that § 30.02(a) is divisible under the modified categorical approach and that a § 30.02(a)(1) conviction supports a § 2L1.2(b)(l)(A)(ii) enhancement. United States v. Conde-Castaneda, 753 F.3d 172, 176 (5th Cir. 2014). Contrary to Flores-Vera’s argument, Conde-Castaneda remains good law in the wake of Mathis. See United States v. Uribe, 838 F.3d 667, 669-71 (5th Cir. 2016), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 137 S.Ct. 1359, 197 L.Ed.2d 542 (2017).

AFFIRMED.