Melisa-Zuniga, federal prisoner # 47145-177, appeals the district court’s denial of her 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) motion to reduce her sentence based on Amendment 794 of the Guidelines. She argues that the amendment is a clarifying amendment and should be applied retroactively.

*343 This court reviews de novo whether a district court has authority to reduce a sentence under § 3582(c)(2). United States v. Jones, 596 F.3d 273, 276 (5th Cir. 2010). Section 3582(c)(2) applies only to retroactive guidelines amendments as set forth in U.S.S.G. § lBl.lO(d). See Dillon v. United States, 560 U.S. 817, 826, 130 S.Ct. 2683, 177 L.Ed.2d 271 (2010). Amendment 794 is not listed in U.S.S.G. § lB1.10(d) as an amendment for which a sentence reduction under § 3582(c)(2) may be granted. See § lB1.10(d). Therefore, the district court did not err in determining that it did not have the authority to reduce Zuniga’s sentence based on Amendment 794. See Jones, 596 F.3d at 276; United States v. Doublin, 572 F.3d 235, 237 (5th Cir. 2009).

AFFIRMED.