United States v. Reymond Lopez-Fregoso
United States v. Reymond Lopez-Fregoso
Opinion
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Reymond Josué Lopez-Frego-so has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). *184 Lopez-Fregoso has filed a response. To the extent Lopez-Fregoso seeks to raise a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel with respect to his guilty plea, the record is not sufficiently developed to allow us to make a fair evaluation of such a claim; we therefore decline to consider any such claim without prejudice to collateral review. See United States v. Isgar, 739 F.3d 829, 841 (5th Cir. 2014).
We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein, as well as Lopez-Fregoso’s response. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivo-lous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, the motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.
Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be *184 published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4,
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.