U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, 2017

United States v. Jonathan Ruckman

United States v. Jonathan Ruckman
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Decided June 1, 2017

United States v. Jonathan Ruckman

Opinion

Case: 16-11414 Document: 00514015906 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/01/2017

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit No. 16-11414 FILED Summary Calendar June 1, 2017 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee v. JONATHAN RUCKMAN, Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 4:16-CR-114-4

Before DAVIS, SOUTHWICK, and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: * The attorney appointed to represent Jonathan Ruckman has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011).

Ruckman has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review.

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

Case: 16-11414 Document: 00514015906 Page: 2 Date Filed: 06/01/2017

No. 16-11414 Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED.

See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.