U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, 2017

United States v. Pedro Arce-Ordones

United States v. Pedro Arce-Ordones
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Decided June 20, 2017

United States v. Pedro Arce-Ordones

Opinion

Case: 16-40934 Document: 00514039657 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/20/2017

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit No. 16-40934 FILED Conference Calendar June 20, 2017 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee v. PEDRO ARCE-ORDONES, Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 2:16-CR-129-1

Before SMITH, CLEMENT, and COSTA, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: * The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Pedro Arce-Ordones has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Arce-Ordones has filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein, as well as Arce-Ordones’s response. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

Case: 16-40934 Document: 00514039657 Page: 2 Date Filed: 06/20/2017

No. 16-40934 appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.