U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, 2017

United States v. Rudy Lopez

United States v. Rudy Lopez
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Decided June 20, 2017

United States v. Rudy Lopez

Opinion

Case: 16-11513 Document: 00514041073 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/20/2017

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit No. 16-11513 FILED Conference Calendar June 20, 2017 Lyle W. Cayce UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Clerk

Plaintiff-Appellee v. RUDY LOPEZ, Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 4:16-CR-122-12

Before SMITH, CLEMENT, and COSTA, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: * The attorney appointed to represent Rudy Lopez has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011).

Lopez has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review.

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

Case: 16-11513 Document: 00514041073 Page: 2 Date Filed: 06/20/2017

No. 16-11513 Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED.

See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.