U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, 2017

United States v. Omar Rodriguez

United States v. Omar Rodriguez
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Decided August 9, 2017

United States v. Omar Rodriguez

Opinion

Case: 16-41544 Document: 00514108721 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/09/2017

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals No. 16-41544 Fifth Circuit FILED Summary Calendar August 9, 2017 Lyle W. Cayce UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Clerk

Plaintiff-Appellee v. OMAR ORLANDO RODRIGUEZ, Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 7:11-CR-93-1

Before KING, SMITH, and ELROD, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: * The attorney appointed to represent Omar Orlando Rodriguez has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Rodriguez has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

Case: 16-41544 Document: 00514108721 Page: 2 Date Filed: 08/09/2017

No. 16-41544 appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.