U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, 2017

United States v. Luis Astello-Villasana

United States v. Luis Astello-Villasana
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Decided August 14, 2017

United States v. Luis Astello-Villasana

Opinion

Case: 17-40082 Document: 00514114468 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/14/2017

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit No. 17-40082 FILED Summary Calendar August 14, 2017 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee v. LUIS JAVIER ASTELLO-VILLASANA, Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 1:16-CR-657-1

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, JONES, and SMITH, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: * The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Luis Javier Astello- Villasana has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Astello-Villasana has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

Case: 17-40082 Document: 00514114468 Page: 2 Date Filed: 08/14/2017

No. 17-40082 nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.