U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, 2017

United States v. Casimiro Soliz

United States v. Casimiro Soliz
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Decided August 18, 2017

United States v. Casimiro Soliz

Opinion

Case: 16-11375 Document: 00514121459 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/18/2017

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-11375 Conference Calendar United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED August 18, 2017 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Plaintiff-Appellee v. CASIMIRO SOLIZ, also known as Casimiro Soliz, Jr., Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 1:99-CR-24-1

Before JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, and ELROD, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: * The attorney appointed to represent Casimiro Soliz has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Soliz has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review.

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

Case: 16-11375 Document: 00514121459 Page: 2 Date Filed: 08/18/2017

No. 16-11375 Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED.

See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.