U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, 2017

United States v. John Rumfield

United States v. John Rumfield
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Decided September 26, 2017

United States v. John Rumfield

Opinion

Case: 16-11518 Document: 00514170860 Page: 1 Date Filed: 09/26/2017

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit No. 16-11518 FILED Summary Calendar September 26, 2017 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee v. JOHN JAMES RUMFIELD, Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 3:14-CR-367-80

Before KING, ELROD, and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: * The attorney appointed to represent John James Rumfield has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Rumfield has filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein, as well as Rumfield’s response. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

Case: 16-11518 Document: 00514170860 Page: 2 Date Filed: 09/26/2017

No. 16-11518 nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.