U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, 2017

United States v. Ricardo Rodriguez-Cordero

United States v. Ricardo Rodriguez-Cordero
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Decided October 24, 2017

United States v. Ricardo Rodriguez-Cordero

Opinion

Case: 17-40154 Document: 00514207650 Page: 1 Date Filed: 10/24/2017

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 17-40154 Conference Calendar United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED October 24, 2017 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Plaintiff-Appellee v. RICARDO RODRIGUEZ-CORDERO, Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 1:16-CR-772-1

Before KING, OWEN, and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: * The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Ricardo Rodriguez- Cordero has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Rodriguez-Cordero has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

Case: 17-40154 Document: 00514207650 Page: 2 Date Filed: 10/24/2017

No. 17-40154 nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.