U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, 2017

United States v. James Sandoval

United States v. James Sandoval
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Decided October 24, 2017

United States v. James Sandoval

Opinion

Case: 17-50009 Document: 00514208034 Page: 1 Date Filed: 10/24/2017

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 17-50009 Conference Calendar United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED October 24, 2017 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Plaintiff-Appellee v. JAMES CHRISTOPHER SANDOVAL, Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 4:16-CR-372-1

Before KING, OWEN, and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: * The attorney appointed to represent James Christopher Sandoval has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Sandoval has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

Case: 17-50009 Document: 00514208034 Page: 2 Date Filed: 10/24/2017

No. 17-50009 appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.